There can be no doubt about the fact that IP is playing a large and increasing role in the world economy. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has reported that global IP filings have steadily increased over the past several years, with patents, trademarks, and industrial designs reaching new highs. This rise reflects the growing appreciation of IP as an asset class.
Nonetheless, there is a lack of the integration of IP into the financial sector and traditional credit models. This article aims to fill that void and present key information regarding the approach taken by banks to assess and fund with reference to IP, the outlook for standard conditions of such loans and the main participants in the field.
The Basics of Bank Lending for IP
Bank lending for intellectual property is a form of asset finance where the bank does not have a tangible asset to repossess if the borrower defaults on the loan. Unlike other types of loans that apply tangible security like equipment or real estate, IP-backed loans takes intellectual property into account.
This distinction is important because it highlights the fact that modern economies’ value is shifting from material to intangible assets. This type of financing takes into account the economic value that is inherent in a company’s intellectual property and offers the much-needed funding that corresponds to the new world of opportunities.
Hence, the terms used in IP lending bear some resemblance to the terms in the traditional asset based lending, but there are changes made to the actual measures to meet the nature of IP. LTV ratios are, for example, generally lower due to problems with estimating values of IP. Interest rates and maturity periods also mimic the perceived risks about intangible investments.
Collateral requirements are highly sensitive especially regarding the legal status of the IP and its marketability. It is therefore important that whoever will engage in the IP-backed loans understand the meaning of these terms.
Typical Terms and Conditions
Like all other types of security, IP-backed loans feature specific contractual provisions due to the specifics of the IP assets. Understanding these terms is important before engaging in this kind of financing.
Loan-to-Value (LTV) Ratios: The LTV ratios for the IP-backed loans are generally lower than the asset-based loans. This conservative approach helps to reduce the elevated risks inherent in intangible assets. Typically, the LTV ratios provided by the banks are between 20% and 50% of the IP’s appraised values.
Interest Rates and Repayment Terms: The cost of financing on IP-backed loans thus depend of the perceived risk and quality of the IP. Other features may include the repayment terms, which also differ with the maturity period also being related to the IP type and timed with anticipated IP revenue streams.
Collateral Requirements: The most important form of security in IP-backed loans is the IP assets themselves. Nevertheless, banks may need some other guarantees or additional collateral in order to minimise risks. This may also be in the form of other security or business owners’ guarantee.
Risk Assessments: Banks also carry out extensive risk assessment to determine the feasibility of the IP as security in a loan. These are legal opinions to guarantee the protection of the IP; and business feasibility studies to determine the commercial viability of the IP.
Banks Active in IP Lending
Some of the popular banks and financial institutions that operating in the IP lending market today include:
Wells Fargo: Wells Fargo offers IP-funded loans from its IP focused business finance arm. The bank presents a competitive terms and conditions where they mainly specialize in patents and trademarks. Due to its great coverage and assets, Wells Fargo is well placed to compete for the IP lending market.
JPMorgan Chase: It can be noted that JPMorgan Chase has created special financing plans for companies with vast IP values. The strategies implemented by the bank are vast IP appraisal and a structure of loans adapted to the nature of the business of IP intensive firms. It is also a global bank, with reasonable capital strength, ideal for IP backed lending.
All of these banks have found their place in the IP lending space by creating tailored programs and services that businesses can use to monetise their intangible assets.
Case Studies and Examples
Case Study 1: Marvel Entertainment’s Trademark Loan
Company Overview: Marvel Entertainment, the creator of some of the favourite comic characters, was struggling with high levels of debt in 1990s. Still, Marvel possessed all sorts of trademark and copyrights that belong to its popular superheroes such as Spider-Man, X-Men, the Hulk and others.
The Challenge: Marvel had run out of capital and required funds to enable it go on with its operations. Working capital was a problem, which restricted traditional financing, yet the character trademarks represented an underutilised asset.
The Solution: In 1997, Marvel managed to borrow $525 million from a group of banks, led by Chase Manhattan Bank with the delivery of the trademarks and movie rights to the characters as collateral. The banks appreciated the worth of Marvel’s intangible assets especially the future cash flows that can be generated from merchandising and future movies.
Outcome: This financing enabled Marvel to ride out its financial difficulties and subsequently ink a series of licensing agreements and the creation of Marvel Studios. The subsequent rise of the Marvel cinematic universe changed the company’s fortunes and showed the lasting value of its IPs.
Lessons Learned: Marvel’s experience proves that financing can be obtained with IP as collateral and that brand-related IP has significant value. It shows that trademarks and copyrights can be used to generate capital.
Case Study 2: DreamWorks Animation’s Copyright Financing
Company Overview: DreamWorks Animation, the creators of such successful animations as “Shrek” and “Kung Fu Panda”, required the funds to make new movies and grow its business. Movies and their characters are copyrighted, and the company’s portfolio was full of these IP assets; however, the problem was in transforming this value into cash.
The Challenge: DreamWorks had to find financing for its films without affecting its ownership or giving up control of its IP. The company’s primary strategy was to utilise its existing portfolio of successful movies and key characters to attract investors.
The Solution: In 2013, DreamWorks Animation obtained a $300 million revolving credit facility from a group of banks with film copyrights as collateral. The bank decided to make an income approach to assess the future cash flows from movie distribution rights, merchandising, and licensing rights.
Outcome: The financing gave DreamWorks the ability to make even better films and continue to grow its worldwide distribution. Additionally, subsequent film releases and successful merchandising and licensing agreements further explained the bank’s belief in the value of DreamWorks’ intellectual property. It was due to the strategic utilisation of its IP assets that the company was sold to NBC Universal in 2016 for $3. 8 billion.
Lessons Learned: The case of DreamWorks demonstrates how income-generating IP, including copyrights for films, can guarantee significant financing for a company.
Challenges and Risks in IP Lending
It should however be noted that like most things in life, IP-backed lending is not without its challenges and risks. Recognising these impediments is crucial for both the lenders targeting IP as collateral and the businesses that seek to monetise this asset.
1. Valuation Uncertainty
Valuation of IP assets has been identified as one of the key problems of lending based on IP. Unlike tangible assets, IP can be quite ambiguous and can change with the market price, changes in the law, and development of technology. This uncertainty poses significant risks for lenders:
Market Volatility: Some of the most significant IP assets, including patents and trademarks, are vulnerable to changes in market trends and consumer preferences. For example, a patent in a particular area of technology will have relatively low value in the future if a new development makes that patent’s product obsolete.
Limited Comparables: It is often challenging to find similar assets to use as benchmarks when valuing IP assets due to their uniqueness. However, in the absence of such a reference point, it becomes extremely difficult to accurately appraise the IP.
2. Enforceability Issues
Another key risk driver is the enforceability of IP rights. If the IP used as collateral is not adequately protected or if there are potential legal disputes, the lender’s ability to recover their investment is affected:
Legal Disputes: IP assets are regularly involved in legal disputes, be it as pertains to the status of a certain patent or its coverage. This litigation can lower the value of the IP and increase the risk for the lenders.
Geographical Limitations: The value of IP is higher when the scope of legal protection is extensive in a particular region. For example, a particular trademark might be extremely valuable in the one country while it may be insignificant in the other due to difference in laws on trademark protection.
3. Revenue Dependency
Many IP-backed loans depend on the revenue-generating capacity of the IP. However, this revenue is not guaranteed and can be affected by a range of factors:
Technological Obsolescence: Specifically, patents can be easily surpassed, especially given the development of new technologies as time goes by. If the IP becomes obsolete the revenues generated by the asset may disappear and what the lender has is a depreciating security.
Market Saturation: It is also possible for even the well-guarded IP to generate relatively low revenues when the market becomes over-saturated. For instance, a brand that previously enjoyed massive market share will find its value drop as other players unleash a barrage of similar brands into the market.
4. Limited Liquidity
IP is not as easily sold off in the case of default as it would be with some physical asset in particular real estate or machinery. Selling or licensing IP can be a complex and time-consuming process because:
Niche Markets: Most IP assets such as patents are for specialty goods and services. It is therefore not always easy to locate a buyer who has the same value for the IP as the original owner hence extending the time for liquidation.
Specialised Knowledge Required: In some cases, the ownership and licensing of IP may be best sold or transferred with professional legal and technical help, making the process cumbersome. This can discourage potential buyers or lower the value of the asset in the market.
5. Bankruptcy Risks
In the event of the borrower’s bankruptcy, IP assets may be entangled in legal proceedings, further complicating the lender’s ability to recover their loan:
• Prioritisation of Claims: Typically, there are many creditors involved in bankruptcy and each of them can have rights to access the company’s IP. There is always a question as to which secured lenders get priority when this type of claim is made and some secured lenders lose part of their claim.
• Diminished Asset Value: The value of IP assets can reduce drastically especially if the IP is directly related to the operations of a business when it goes bankrupt. Of course, if the business is shut down, then IP may not only stop producing income but also clients will have reduced interest in the IP assets.
6. Regulatory and Compliance Challenges
The regulatory environment surrounding IP can also pose risks, especially in international markets:
Varying International Laws: There are copious differences between one jurisdiction and another in terms of IP laws and the varying strength of IP protection. For instance, a patent, which is valid in the U. S., may not hold such significance in another country and thus has a bearing on the global value of the asset.
Compliance Costs: The protection of IP especially patents is more of a continuous process as there are legal and regulatory requirements for filings, renewals, and enforcements amongst others. Such costs can accumulate, especially when the IP extends across a number of countries.
In today’s knowledge economy, intellectual property is quickly becoming one of the most valuable forms of assets, and its utility in regard to collateralising loans with banks is also gradually being realised. But it is imperative to understand that IP lending is not an easy activity and involves considerable inspection of the value of the assets that are being pledged, how easily these could be enforced, and the existing market demand for such IPs.
Indeed, numerous risks accompany each side of the transaction: for lenders, these include valuation risks and legal and regulatory risks, while borrowers face similar difficulties. Thus, by knowing these risks and referring to the cases of Marvel and DreamWorks, companies can effectively use their IP to attract financing, while banks can enter a new, rapidly growing market as long as they apply proper expertise and caution.
Comments